If There’s TPACK, is There Technological Pedagogical Reasoning and Action?

ID: 51537 Type: Full Paper - Book (submit final version now)
  1. Judi Harris, William & Mary School of Education, United States
  2. Michael Phillips, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Australia

Thursday, March 29 1:45 PM-2:15 PM Location: Banneker View on map

No presider for this session.

Abstract: The notion of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) was modified by multiple authors to become technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK or TPACK), spawning much active and dynamic scholarship since 2001. Currently, many researchers see TPCK/TPACK as the knowledge that teachers need to integrate technologies effectively into learning and teaching. Shulman’s PCK, however, was just one element in a much larger conceptualization of a knowledge base for educators, and that full range of knowledge was posited as being used by teachers in recursive processes of pedagogical reasoning and action. This begs the question: if there is TPCK/TPACK, which is rooted in PCK, as many studies have suggested, is there also technological pedagogical reasoning and action (TPR&A)? If so, what are its distinguishing characteristics? If not, why would TPCK not be mirrored in TPR&A? These questions are addressed in the following multivocal literature review.


Conference attendees are able to comment on papers, view the full text and slides, and attend live presentations. If you are an attendee, please login to get full access.